Research Log Entry I: Our First Library Class

When I walked into our first physical class of Library, I honestly thought that I knew everything I needed to know in order to get by in the real world. While sitting attentively, I found that there were somethings that I knew and other things that I didn't.

A big thing that that I know how to do--and am happy to declare--is "google" information. When exploring the Web, I picked up the the commands and words to put in over time. Since about my freshman year in high school, I think that I have specified search criteria quite well and have become adept at it. It's gotten me far. From writing research papers to AP (advanced placement) papers, knowing what to looking for and learning it has always come in handy. Examining the validity, quality, and credibility of web pages are vital and crucial to desirable outcomes. Now, I'm in college, a student at one of America's Best Western Colleges, California State University of the East Bay. What else can I say?

However, there are things that surprised me as well. One small thing that I did not pick up before was the whole breakdown of what goes into the address bar. I never thought that it would be this in depth. But, dwelling upon the subject more, the many parts of the URL do have purpose. And, because of that, it makes sense to me. To be honest, all I knew was that "www" meant "World Wide Web." Yep, that's about it.

I think that after sitting through the small amount of time in the class on Friday, I can more effectively search for sources for all projects. Professor Aline, I commend you on your thoroughness. The handouts are pretty nifty as well. Moving along, this information has reinforced what I already know. Things that I must look for are--as I have discussed before--the validity, quality, and credibility. I need to think about: Is this source relevant to my topic? Is this a legitimate source by a legitimate author? Will this be a good source of information? Are there any ulterior motives to this or is this for real?

What I thought was a good idea was that website, www.digg.com. As I thought about it, it seemed like a very good idea. Having people rate the relevance, accuracy, and quality of websites, rather than having someone precariously and arbitrarily choose a source for himself, reflects the idea that in order to come to a conclusion, there needs to be a general consensus and agreement on the subject being tested.

After walking out of our first physical class of Library, I felt comforted in learning the new things taught. Now, I know what to really do when considering web sources.

"...and knowing is half the battle!"